Globalization and the Environment in International Relations: Towards Effective Growth with International Agreements

Authors

  • Dr. Bineet Kaur Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, SGND Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54741/ssjar.2.5.1

Keywords:

international relations, sustainable development goals, agreement, climate change

Abstract

In the last decade, international commitments between the countries have seen existence of more complex debate and disagreement over the cause of compliances. The growth and development of international legal institutions, and judicial bodies since the end of the Cold War, on the other hand, has provided the empirical foundation and a policy need for increased focus on the function of international law. The application of law to organise global politics appears to be expanding across a wide range of issue domains. The fundamental problem is how laws and legalisation affect state conduct, which is frequently explained in terms of compliance. The proponents of globalisation believe that these two factors—economic growth and rising per capita incomes—are crucial for creating the resources and political will needed to manage the environment globally. Other environmental advantages of globalisation are also seen by optimists. It involves fostering international collaboration and integration as well as shared environmental norms and standards, which improves a system of sovereign nations' ability to handle issues like ozone depletion and climate change. This study presents the ways of international agreements, compliance of international affairs, effect of globalization, and the benefits of environment to cope with challenges and finding new opportunities of growth for a nation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balboa, C. M. (2017). Mission interference: How competition confounds accountability for environmental nongovernmental organizations. Review of Policy Research, 34(1), 110–131.

Bansal, S., & Goel, T. (2021). A review on beneficiaries’ contentment towards medical services under employees’ state insurance scheme. VEETHIKA - An International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 7(4), 30–33. doi: 10.48001/veethika.2021.07.04.006.

Barkay, T. (2009). Regulation and voluntarism: A case study of governance in the making. Regulation Governance, 3(4), 360–375.

Bansal, V. P. (2016). Human resource management system: Challenges and opportunities. VEETHIKA - An International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 2(4), 5–9. doi: 10.48001/veethika.2016.02.04.002.

Decastri, M., Battini, S., Buonocore, F., & Gagliarducci, F. (Eds.). (2021). Organizational development in public administration. organizational development in public administration. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-43799-2.

Forti, V., Baldé, C. P., Kuehr, R., & Bel, G. (2020). The global e-waste monitor.

Ganzeboom, H. B. G., Graaf, P. M. D. E., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic occupational status. Social Science Research, 56, 1–56. doi: 10.1006/ssre.1996.0010.

Kaur, A. (2021). Role of digital Finance to improvise financial inclusion and sustainable employment.

Lohmann, L. (2008). Carbon trading, climate justice and the production of ignorance: Ten examples. Development. doi: 10.1057/dev.2008.27.

Mittal, P. (2020a). A multi-criterion decision analysis based on PCA for analyzing the digital technology skills in the effectiveness of government services. in: 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application, DASA 2020, pp. 490–494. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/DASA51403.2020.9317241.

Mittal, P. (2020b). Impact of digital capabilities and technology skills on effectiveness of government in public services. in: 2020 International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry: Way Towards a Sustainable Economy (ICDABI), pp. 1–5. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICDABI51230.2020.9325647.

Moya Clemente, I., Ribes Giner, G., & Sanahuja Vélez, G. (2020). Towards sustainability in university education. Improving university graduates chances of employability by participation in a high achievement academic program. Sustainability, 12(2), 680. doi: 10.3390/su12020680.

Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., & Grove, J. M. (2004). Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 369–384. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035.

Sarkar, a. N., & Dash, S. (2011). Emissions trading and carbon credit accounting for sustainable energy development with focus on India. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 7, 50–80. doi: 10.1177/097324701100700104.

Srivastava, a. (2007). Cointegration of asian markets with US markets: International diversification perspectives. Global Business Review, 8(2), 251–265. doi: 10.1177/097215090700800205.

Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., … O’Connell, D. (2017). Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 911–919. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3.

Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2022

How to Cite

Kaur, B. (2022). Globalization and the Environment in International Relations: Towards Effective Growth with International Agreements. Social Science Journal for Advanced Research, 2(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.54741/ssjar.2.5.1