360-degree Feedback Mechanism for Performance Appraisal of Library Workforce in Academic Libraries
Keywords:
performance appraisal, 360-degree feedback mechanism, library workforce, academic librariesAbstract
Performance Appraisal (PA) is a systematic method for evaluating staff performance in any organizations whether profit-making or non-profiting making concerns. Among the various methods used for PA, 360-degree feedback method is very much useful not only for employer but employees also. It is a process where employees receive confidential and anonymous feedback from the employees who work around them. This process assists the employers in making human resource decisions e.g. pay adjustment, promotion/demotion or even termination etc. at the same time employees can derive benefits from this method of PA. These include development of their workplace competencies. For Library and Information Science (LIS) field this method can also be used as an effective tool for the professional development of library staff. PA is a crucial professional issue in LIS sector which helps the organization to fulfill its objectives as envisaged by Dr. S.R. Ranganathan in his five laws of library science in which he stressed on the skills and competencies of library staff to satisfy the needs of the library user. The present paper highlights on the use of 360-degree feedback mechanism for library workforce engaged in academic libraries in their performance appraisal. Methodology followed in writing this paper includes theoretical exploration of existing literature in this context. This paper will help library sector employers for appraising their manpower in formulating human resource decision. It will also help other stakeholders in LIS sector to understand the human resource management aspects.
Downloads
References
Kanaslan, E., & Iyem, C. (2016). Is 360 degree feedback appraisal an effective way of performance evaluation. The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6, 172-182.
Baroda, S., Sharma, C., & Bhatt, J. K., (2012). 360 degree feedback appraisals- An innovative approach of performance management system. International Journal of Management & Information Technology, 1(2), 53-66.
Brett, J. F., & Atwater, L. E. (2001). 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 930-942.
Humera, Q. (2020). 360 degree performance effects on employee attitude, professional effectiveness and general work performance. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5(4), 56-59.
Abdolhossein, F., Fatemeh, N., & Maryam, H. (2013). Performance appraisal of librarians by 360 degree feedback: The case of public librarians of Guilan province, Iran. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 18, 419-440.
Bracken, D., Rose, D., & Church, A. (2016). The evolution and devolution of 360° feedback. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 761 - 794.
Sahija, D. (2022). Employee performance appraisal process and its impact on employee satisfaction. Technoarete Transactions on Economics and Business Systems, 1(2), 29-34.
London, M., & Beatty, R. (1993). 360‐degree feedback as a competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 32, 353-372.
Obholzer, A. (2020). Workplace intelligence: Unconscious forces and how to manage them. (1st ed.). Routledge.
Luthans, F., & Peterson, S. (2003). 360-Degree feedback with systematic coaching: Empirical analysis suggests a winning combination. Human Resource Management, 42, 243-256.
www.naac.gov.in
Ward, A. (1995). 360-degree feedback. Institute of Personnel and Development.
Bracken, D. W. (1994). Straight talk about multirater feedback. Training & Development, 48(9), 44–51.
Fleenor, J. W., & Prince, J. M. (1997). Using 360-degree feedback in organizations: An annotated bibliography. Center for Creative Leadership.
Pasmore, W. A. (1998). From traditional hierarchy to culture-focused organizational change. In S. A. Mohrman, J. R. Galbraith, E. E. Lawler III, & Associates (Eds.), Tomorrow's organization: Crafting winning capabilities in a dynamic world (pp. 73–94). Jossey-Bass.
Edwards, M. R., & Ewen, A. J. (1996). How to manage performance and pay with 360-degree feedback. Compensation & Benefits Review, 28(3), 41–46.
Cronshaw, S. F., & Lord, R. G. (1987). Effects of categorization, attribution, and encoding processes on leadership perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 97–106.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Chinmay Mukhopadhyay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Research Articles in 'Social Science Journal for Advanced Research' are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This license allows you to share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.