Critical Analysis of the New Criminal Laws and their Detrimental Effects on Civil Liberties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54741/SSJAR/6.3.2026.376Keywords:
FIR, sedition, digitisation, arbitrary arrest, detention, fundamental rightsAbstract
In 2024, India enacted three landmark criminal laws. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita BNSS 2023 and The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam BSA 2023 to replace the colonial Indian Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code and the Indian Evidence Act respectively. While aimed at modernizing the criminal justice system through victim centric approaches, technology integration and faster trial processes with reformative ideas, these law laws have sparked critical debate and have become the subject of controversy ever since they were presented as measures in the parliament. As the date of their enforcement finally arrives, the chorus of criticisms only grow louder regarding their adverse impact on civil liberties. It is also pertinent to mentioned that under the 3 new criminal laws registering First Information Report (F.I.R) has no longer become effective as the new law under BNSS may likely result in delay investigation or misuse of power by the police official and most importantly the new laws also raise more concern about arbitrary detention and abuse of power against the innocent denizens infringing their fundamental rights. In 2022, before the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) was enacted, the Supreme Court had halted ongoing criminal trials and court proceedings under section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), but under the new BNS, it is also believed that the new sedition law has opened its backdoor under section 152, posing a greater threat to the nation's citizens as a whole. Besides all this concern with the arrival of these 3 new laws it has create more confusion in the syllabus of the school and colleges, the working of the court system, etc. This paper analyses the historical context, the key features of these laws and delve into the landscape of the surge in the criticisms and outlines the civil liberties concerns under the new criminal laws emerging from their implementation.
Downloads
References
Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1995 SC 1785 (India). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/123425906/
Chandrachud, DY (n.d.). Conference on India’s progressive path in the administration of justice system.
Firoz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi). AIRONLINE 2020 DEL 837 (Delhi High Court, May 29, 2020). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/95185253/
Gazette Notification. (2024, July 16). Legislative department, Ministry of law and justice, Government of India.
Home Minister Amit Shah Says Sedition Is Dead, But Its Replacement Is More Fearsome Than the Colonial Law Ever Was. (2023, August 14). Available at: https://article-14.com/post/home-minister-amit-shah-says-sedition-is-dead-but-its-replacement-is-more-fearsome-than-the-colonial-law-ever-was-64d99ff8dc0d8. Last visited on 12-07-2025.
Kedar Nath Bajoria and Another v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1954 SC 660 (India). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1908113/
Law Commission of India. (1969). Forty-first report: The code of criminal procedure, 1898, 1. Government of India, Ministry of Law. https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3ca0daec69b5adc880fb464895726dbdf/uploads/2022/08/2022082436.pdf
Mohammed Sajid v. State of Kerala, Bail Application No. 2850 of 2023, High Court of Kerala, decided on May 12, 2023 (India). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/128708653/
Prof. Mohan Gopal. (2024). Common cause–CJIR discussion on their aims and efficacy (Decoding the new laws). Civil and Military Law Journal (CJIR), XLIII(3).
Ranjan Sharma v. State of H.P., Cr. MP(M) No. 204 of 2023 (H.P. High Court, January 27, 2023). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/119438841/
Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab, AIR 1965 SC 444 (India). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/983057/
S. G. Vombatkere v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 682 of 2021 (India). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/134384639/
State of Karnataka v. Kalandar Shafi, Criminal Petition No. 13459 of 2024 & Writ Petition No. 33526 of 2024, High Court of Karnataka, decided on December 13, 2024 (India). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/183909908/
Supreme Court Dismissing PIL. (February 26, 2024). Supreme Court of India.
Thapar, K. (2024, June 24). Why Indira Jaising thinks the new criminal laws should be deferred. https://thewire.in/law/full-text-why-indira-jaising-thinks-the-new-criminal-laws-should-be-deferred
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (2023). https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/250883_english_01042024.pdf
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (2023). PRS legislative research. https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (2023). https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2024-04/250882_english_01042024_0.pdf
The Code of Criminal Procedure (1973). https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/15272/1/the_code_of_criminal_procedure,_1973.pdf
The Constitution of India (1950). (pp. 10–11). https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/19150/1/constitution_of_india.pdf
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/15351/1/iea_1872.pdf
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act 45 of 1860) https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/indianpenalcode/index.php
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khatter Playson Anal, Pamreiso Raiping

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Research Articles in 'Social Science Journal for Advanced Research' are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This license allows you to share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.