Borderland Dynamics and Cross-Border Integration: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Indo-Myanmar Border and Northeast India's Geopolitical Complexities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54741/SSJAR/6.2.2026.347Keywords:
border dynamics, manipur, north-east india, indo-myanmar borderAbstract
This comprehensive research paper synthesizes insights from over 50 scholarly sources to examine the multifaceted dimensions of borderland studies, with particular emphasis on the Indo-Myanmar border and the geopolitical complexities of Northeast India. The paper explores theoretical frameworks for understanding border regions, analyzes the socioeconomic and political realities of the Indo-Myanmar borderland, examines cross-border integration mechanisms, and investigates the ethnic conflicts and governance challenges that characterize Northeast India. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship spanning political science, geography, sociology, and international relations, this study reveals that borders function not merely as dividing lines but as dynamic spaces of interaction, contestation, and opportunity. The analysis demonstrates how India's Act East Policy intersects with local borderland realities, creating both opportunities for regional connectivity and challenges related to security, identity, and sovereignty. Key findings indicate that effective border management requires balancing security imperatives with the lived experiences of borderland communities, recognizing the fluidity of ethnic identities across artificial boundaries, and developing governance frameworks that accommodate the unique characteristics of frontier regions. The paper concludes by identifying critical gaps in current approaches and proposing directions for future research and policy development in borderland studies and cross-border cooperation.
Downloads
References
Allen, D. S., Addy, R., & Chakraborty, S. (2025). Unravelling the identity conundrum in Manipur: Gender, ethnicity and peace-building. Journal of Contemporary Politics, 4(3), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.53989/jcp.v4i3.25.35
Anderson, M. (1996). Frontiers, territory and state formation in the modern World. Oxford: Polity Press.
Andreas, P., & Snyder, T. (2000). The wall around the West: state borders and immigration controls in North America and Europe. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield http://bvbm2.bibbvb.de:8993/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=010516848&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
Banki, S., & Pasha, S. (2025). The spatial dimensions of migrant politics: To the border and beyond. Journal of Refugee Studies, 38(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaf028
Barua, T. (2020). The look east policy/act east policy-driven development model in Northeast India. Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, 24(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973598420908844
Baruah, P. J. (2022, November 16). BIMSTEC and northeast India: Sub-regional cooperation. (18th Professor Madhab Chandra Bora Memorial Oration). Tezpur Univerity.
Baruah, S. (2024). When civilizational nationalism meets sub nationalism: The crisis in Manipur. Studies in Indian Politics, 12(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/23210230241235360
Baud, M., & Schendel, W. (1997). Toward a comparative history of borderlands. Journal of World History, 8(2), 211–242.
Bauman, Z. (2002). Society under siege. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bhattacharyya, R. (2021, November 18). Calls to fence the India-Myanmar border are gathering steam again. The Diplomat. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://thediplomat.com/2021/11/calls-for-fencing-the-india-myanmar-border-gather-steam-again/&ved=2ahUKEwjCz5momYmTAxXKxTgGHTqVDZMQFnoECBsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3K6xaz2jExoWCBOv9-3Zae
Braun, R., & Kienitz, O. (2022). Comparative politics in borderlands: Actors, identities, and strategies. Annual Review of Political Science, 25, 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-010103
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Chakrabarty, B. (2014). Localising governance in India: Federalism and decentralisation in the Nagaland and Manipur hills. Routledge. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.routledge.com/Localizing-Governance-in-India/Chakrabarty/p/book/9780367889630&ved=2ahUKEwiM85n-mYmTAxWk8zgGHcT7JdcQFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw2F2PExwLD0TiCtG3gFnjM0
Chaturvedi, M. (2011, February 1). India's strategic interests in Myanmar: An interview with Shyam Saran. IPCS Special Report 98. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.ipcs.org/issue_select.php%3FrecNo%3D388&ved=2ahUKEwi-3NqdmomTAxW1RCoJHYEnFEQQFnoECBkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2DrCHNZGmpX9jC_-926K69
Das, P. (2016). Security challenges and the management of the India–Myanmar border. Strategic Analysis, 42(6), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2018.1557932
Das, P. (2023). India's approach to border management. Taylor & Francis.
Doley, S. J. (2017). India's Look East Policy: Relationship with ASEAN and opportunities for Northeast India. FOCUS: Journal of International Business, 4(01). https://doi.org/10.17492/focus.v4i01.9535
Dutta, S. (2018, October 25). India and Myanmar quietly open up their border for villagers and trade. The Print. https://theprint.in/diplomacy/india-and-Myanmar-quietly-open-up-their-border-for-villagers-and-trade/139877
Donnan, H., & Wilson, T. M. (1999). Borders: Frontiers of identity, nation and state. Oxford: Berg.
E-Pao. (2011, May 9). Border fencing upsets village life in Moreh. The Sangai Express, via E-Pao https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://e-pao.net/GP.asp%3Fsrc%3D3..100511.may11&ved=2ahUKEwjqmPu7rYmTAxXBT2wGHVN3MzoQFnoECBkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2h77jvrY2zqkO9geTaBgeS
Græger, N. (2024). High politics and everyday practices at the border: Emerging communities of practice in the high north. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(1), ksad075. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksad075
Guyot-Réchard B. (2021). Tangled lands: Burma and India's unfinished separation, 1937–1948. Journal of Asian Studies, 80(2), 293–315.
Haokip, S. (2023). Memory and kinship across the Indo-Myanmar border: A study of the lived experiences of displaced Kuki families. Memory Studies, 17(6), 1591-1607. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231188484 (Original work published 2024).
Haokip T. (2022). Ethnocracy in deeply divided societies: The dynamics of ethnopolitics in Manipur. in Wouters J. J. P. (Ed.), Vernacular politics in Northeast India: Democracy, ethnicity and indigeneity (pp. 175–198). Oxford University Press.
Jilangamba Y. (2015). Beyond the ethno-territorial binary: Evidencing the hill and valley peoples in Manipur. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 38(2), 276–289.
Khwairakpam, G. S., (2023). Borderland realities: Decoding the Socioeconomic and political complexities of the Indo-Myanmar Border. Journal of Psychology and Political Science, 3(5), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.55529/jpps.35.8.18
Kipgen, N. (2014, January 27). Easing India-Myanmar border dispute. Huffington Post. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/easing-indiamyanmar-borde_b_4633040&ved=2ahUKEwj1nteRoomTAxWne2wGHelkAUUQFnoECBkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3ZyRxqumImBu8EMhLrTwFb
Kolossov, V. (2005). Theorizing borders border studies: Changing perspectives and theoretical approaches. Geopolitics, 10, 606–632.
Kumar, V., & Bhatnagar, G. V. (2013, December 6). Top MHA officials to visit Manipur-Myanmar border on Saturday to resolve fencing dispute. The Hindu. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/top-mha-officials-to-visit- manipurmyanmar-border-on-saturday-to-resolve-fencing-dispute/article5430397.ece
Kuppuswamy, C. S. (2006). Indo-Myanmar relations—A review. Working Paper No. 2043, South Asia Analysis Group.
Laithangbam, I. (2021, November 16). Manipur border fence: Villages maintain age-old relations even as protests continue. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com
Longkumer A. (2017). The power of persuasion: Hindutva, Christianity, and the discourse of religion and culture in Northeast India. Religion, 47(2), 1-25. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2016.1256845.
Majumdar, M. (2020). India–Myanmar border fencing and India's act east policy. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 76(1), 58-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928419901190 (Original work published 2020).
Mishra, S. (2011). Becoming a borderland: The politics of space and identity in colonial Northeastern India. London: Routledge
Nath, D., & Saikia, M. (2025). Northeast and India's cross-border connectivity: A leap into the changing dimensions. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251356367
Newman, D. (2003). On borders and power: A theoretical framework. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 18(1), 13–25.
Nijkamp P. (2021). Borders as opportunities in the space-economy: towards a theory of enabling space. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 5(1), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-021-00191-x
Pascariu, G. C., Kourtit, K., & Tiganasu, R. (2020). Regional development, spatial resilience and geographical borders. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 12(5), 749-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12351
Pau, P. K. (2012). Missionary endeavor and Indigenous response among the Zo (Chin) of the India–Burma borderland. Journal of Religion and Society, 14, 1-17.
Paul, H., Chilla, T., & Sommer, C. (2025). Economy and border regions – A research gap? Results from a scoping review. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2025.2539973
Phanjoubam P. (2020, March 25). A new twist in the plot in Manipur. Telegraph (Kolkata). https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/bjp-choice-of-manipur-titular-customary-king-leishemba-sanajaoba-as-only-rajya-sabha/cid/1759170
Rumford, C. (2006). Introduction: Theorizing borders. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 155–169.
Saikia A. (2024, January 26). In Imphal, the state's surrender to an armed Meitei militia with a 'Taliban-like' grip. https://scroll.in/article/1062725/in-imphal-the-states-surrender-to-an-armed-meitei-militia-with-taliban-like-grip
Sakhong, L. H. (2010). The future of Indo-Burma relations: A view from divided peoples. In Lian H. Sakhong (Ed.), in Defence of Chin identity: The ethnic nationalities' struggle for democracy, human rights, and federalism in Burma (p. 270). Orchid Press.
Shahriar, S. (2021). Bangladesh-India border issues: A critical review, Geoforum, 124, 257-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.05.008
Thakur S., & Venugopal R. (2019). Parallel governance and political order in contested territory: Evidence from the Indo-Naga Ceasefire. Asian Security, 15(3), 285–303.
The Indian Express. (2013, August 28). After China, Myanmar intrudes into Indian territory, attempts fencing along Manipur border. The Indian Express, https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/after-china-myanmar-intrudes-into-indian-territory-attempts-fencing-along-manipur-border/&ved=2ahUKEwiU5NjhrImTAxXFXmwGHWoXAngQFnoECBkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2oXvJpngGwIRvCrKcukJTj
Tuck, R. H., Ostrand, N. M., & Damsa, D. (2025). The constitution and contestability of borders. Geopolitics, 30(5), 1965–1977. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2025.2548088
Van Houtum, H. (2005). The geopolitics of borders and boundaries. Geopolitics, 10(4), 672–679.
Varol, C.& Soylemez, E. (2018). Border permeability and socio‐spatial interaction in Turkish and the EU border regions, Regional Science Policy & Practice, 10(4), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12153
Zou D. V. (2009). The pasts of a fringe community: Ethno-history and fluid identity of the Zou in Manipur. Indian Historical Review, 36(2), 209–235.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 As. Zinghorrin, Dr. Ruolkhumzo, Sp. Sokatung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Research Articles in 'Social Science Journal for Advanced Research' are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This license allows you to share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
