Green Governmentality and Marginalised Populations: A Case Study of the Brahmaputra River, India

Authors

  • Ningombam Sympathy Devi Research Scholar, Department of Political Science, Manipur University, Canchipur, Manipur, India
  • Mangoljao Maibam Assistant Professor, N.G. College, Imphal, Manipur, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54741/SSJAR/6.2.2026.335

Keywords:

brahmaputra, environment, green governmentality, marginalisation, pollution

Abstract

The concept of Green Governmentality emerges with the rise of modern environmentalism during the 1960s and 1970s. Biopolitical ideas form the foundation of the literature on green governmentality. It relates to an art of government that implies humans must manage themselves successfully, in accordance with nature’s limits, in order to achieve modernity. The rise of environmental issues in contemporary society has made a positive response for environmental politics. Environmental pollution is now regarded as a human-caused problem that cannot be ignored worldwide. Brahmaputra is one of the major rivers in India, bearing the burden of many citizens’ survival and means of their livelihood. Polluting the nearby areas and the river itself causes human concerns like health hygiene, as well as having an impact on certain human activities, directly or indirectly. Many people whose socioeconomic status is below poverty lines depend on the river for survival. They are also the frontline warriors in any natural calamity that occurs in the area. Given the significance of the river and the impact of its pollution on marginalised groups of people, a call for Green Governmentality, with the collaboration of both the government and local residents, is required to improve the condition of the river and marginalised groups. The present paper aims to examine the varied impacts of pollution in the Brahmaputra River on marginalised sections of people. It also intends to highlight the importance of the necessary call for adopting green governmentality to bring about a positive change in the river and improve the living conditions of the marginalized populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nath, G.J. (2007). Forests, rivers and society-A study in social transformation in Medieval Assam. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 68, 464-474.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). https://www.ipcc.ch

Sushanta Kumar Mahapatra. (2005). Sovereign states and surging water: Brahmaputra river between China and India. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).

Sanjib Baruah. (2012). Whose river is it anyway? Political economy of hydropower in the eastern Himalayas. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(29), 41-52.

Kevin Grove. (2014). Critical environmental politics (ed.), Carl Death.

Eva Lovbrand, & Johannes Stripple. (2014). Foucault 2008. Critical environmental politics (ed.), Carl Death.

Eva Lovbrand, & Johannes Stripple. (2014). Baldwin 2003:417. Critical environmental politics (ed.), Carl Death.

Eva Lovbrand, & Johannes Stripple. (2014). Critical environmental politics (ed.), Carl Death.

UN 2023 water conference, United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021- 2030, www. decadeonrestoration.org

World seagrass day 2023, United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021- 2030, www. decadeonrestoration.org

7 year strategy plan, Govt. of Assam, Water Resources Department, 2014-2015 - 2030-2031.

Published

30-03-2026
CITATION
DOI: 10.54741/SSJAR/6.2.2026.335
Published: 30-03-2026

How to Cite

Devi, N. S., & Maibam, M. (2026). Green Governmentality and Marginalised Populations: A Case Study of the Brahmaputra River, India. Social Science Journal for Advanced Research, 6(2), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.54741/SSJAR/6.2.2026.335

Issue

Section

Articles