Green Governmentality and Marginalised Populations: A Case Study of the Brahmaputra River, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54741/SSJAR/6.2.2026.335Keywords:
brahmaputra, environment, green governmentality, marginalisation, pollutionAbstract
The concept of Green Governmentality emerges with the rise of modern environmentalism during the 1960s and 1970s. Biopolitical ideas form the foundation of the literature on green governmentality. It relates to an art of government that implies humans must manage themselves successfully, in accordance with nature’s limits, in order to achieve modernity. The rise of environmental issues in contemporary society has made a positive response for environmental politics. Environmental pollution is now regarded as a human-caused problem that cannot be ignored worldwide. Brahmaputra is one of the major rivers in India, bearing the burden of many citizens’ survival and means of their livelihood. Polluting the nearby areas and the river itself causes human concerns like health hygiene, as well as having an impact on certain human activities, directly or indirectly. Many people whose socioeconomic status is below poverty lines depend on the river for survival. They are also the frontline warriors in any natural calamity that occurs in the area. Given the significance of the river and the impact of its pollution on marginalised groups of people, a call for Green Governmentality, with the collaboration of both the government and local residents, is required to improve the condition of the river and marginalised groups. The present paper aims to examine the varied impacts of pollution in the Brahmaputra River on marginalised sections of people. It also intends to highlight the importance of the necessary call for adopting green governmentality to bring about a positive change in the river and improve the living conditions of the marginalized populations.
Downloads
References
Nath, G.J. (2007). Forests, rivers and society-A study in social transformation in Medieval Assam. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 68, 464-474.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). https://www.ipcc.ch
Sushanta Kumar Mahapatra. (2005). Sovereign states and surging water: Brahmaputra river between China and India. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
Sanjib Baruah. (2012). Whose river is it anyway? Political economy of hydropower in the eastern Himalayas. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(29), 41-52.
Kevin Grove. (2014). Critical environmental politics (ed.), Carl Death.
Eva Lovbrand, & Johannes Stripple. (2014). Foucault 2008. Critical environmental politics (ed.), Carl Death.
Eva Lovbrand, & Johannes Stripple. (2014). Baldwin 2003:417. Critical environmental politics (ed.), Carl Death.
Eva Lovbrand, & Johannes Stripple. (2014). Critical environmental politics (ed.), Carl Death.
UN 2023 water conference, United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021- 2030, www. decadeonrestoration.org
World seagrass day 2023, United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021- 2030, www. decadeonrestoration.org
7 year strategy plan, Govt. of Assam, Water Resources Department, 2014-2015 - 2030-2031.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ningombam Sympathy Devi, Mangoljao Maibam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Research Articles in 'Social Science Journal for Advanced Research' are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This license allows you to share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.