Emerging Dynamics of Dissent in Indian Democracy: A Critical Perspective

Authors

  • Bhagyasree Menon C Assistant Professor on Contract, Department of Political Science, Devaswom Board College, Thalayolaparambu, MG University, Kottayam, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16777613

Keywords:

democracy, dissent, hindu ideology, movements, silencing voices, suppression

Abstract

India, a democratic nation, prioritizes the welfare and development of its citizens. To ensure this well-being and achieve the comprehensive development of every individual residing within its borders, the Constitution grants various rights. Among these, fundamental rights hold the utmost significance. These rights are essential for the well-being of individuals and serve as the cornerstone for the overall development of Indian democracy. While certain fundamental rights apply exclusively to Indian citizens, the majority extend to all individuals residing in India.
The rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution are crucial for the development of both individuals and the nation. The suppression of any of these rights negatively impacts growth. In contemporary Indian society, several of these rights are being stifled, with the Right to Dissent—protected under Article 19—being particularly vital. The Right to Dissent allows individuals to express differing or opposing views regarding the policies and ideologies of the current government. This right is fundamental to the progress of a democratic nation; its suppression can ultimately threaten the very foundation of democracy itself.
This paper addresses the growing suppression of the right to dissent and the various challenges individuals encounter as a consequence. It examines the current state of dissent in Indian society, analyzing the underlying factors that contribute to this phenomenon and offering potential solutions. Recognizing the significance of this issue, the study utilizes secondary sources and aims to mitigate the negative impact of this suppression on individuals and the nation overall.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Admin. (2023). Theories of democracy - Politics for India. https://politicsforindia.com/theories-of-democracy/.

Basu, S., & Sen, S. (2023). Silenced voices: unravelling India’s dissent crisis through historical and contemporary analysis of free speech and suppression. Information & Communications Technology Law, 33(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2023.2249780

Benhabib, S. (2007). Democratic exclusions and democratic iterations: Dilemmas of 'Just Membership' and prospects of cosmopolitan federalism. European Journal of Political Theory, 445-462.

Brown, W. (2008). Regulating aversion: Tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton University Press.

Chatterjee .P (2011). The curious career of liberalism in India. Modern Intellectual History, 8(3), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244311000412.

Civicus Monitor. (2022). Government agencies used to silence dissent in India as its rights record is scrutinised at the UN - Civicus monitor. https://monitor.civicus.org/explore/government-agencies-used-silence-dissent-india-its-rights-record-scrutinised-un/.

Democracy. (2023). Manual for human rights education with young people. https://www.coe.int/en/web/compass/democracy.

Draft Information Technology [Intermediaries Guidelines (Amendment) Rules] 2018. (2018). PRS legislative research. https://prsindia.org/billtrack/draft-information-technology-intermediaries-guidelines-amendment-rules-2018.

Edu, L. (2024). 11 features of democracy in India. https://leverageedu.com/blog/features-of-democracy/.

EPW Engage. (2022). Dissent in a democracy: Political imprisonment under the UAPA in India. https://www.epw.in/engage/article/dissent-democracy-political-imprisonment-under.

Gupta D. (2020). The right to dissent is the most important right granted by the constitution: Justice Gupta. (n.d.). The Wire. https://thewire.in/law/right-to-dissent-constitution-justice-deepak-gupta.

Gyan Vihar World. (2024). The evolution of democracy in India: From independence to today. https://gyanviharworld.school/the-evolution-of-democracy-in-india-from-independence-to-today/.

Human rights commission issues notice to Manipur on women being paraded naked’ (India Today, 2023). https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/human-rights-commission-issues-notice-to-manipur-on-women-being-paraded-naked-2409540-2023-07-21.

Impri, Nigam, A. D. S., & Vithita. (2023). The right to dissent in the socio-legal context: Reimagining Citizenship, Strengthening Democracy. IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute. https://www.impriindia.com/insights/right-to-dissent-citizenship-democracy/.

Jaffrelot, C. (2017). India’s democracy at 70: Toward a Hindu state?. Journal of Democracy, 28(3), 52–63

Kathuria. R, Kedia. M, Varma. G, Bagchi. K, & Sekhani. R. (2018). The anatomy of an internet blackout: Measuring the economic impact of internet shutdowns in India. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. http://icrier.org/pdf/Anatomy_of_an_Internet_Blackout.pdf.

Kaul, N. (2023). Dissent and democracy in contemporary India: Visions of education, versions of citizenship, and variants of Jihad. Journal of Muslim Philanthropy &Amp; Civil Society, 7(1). Retrieved from: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/muslimphilanthropy/article/view/5012.

Khandhadai, G. (2021). Social media has weakened India’s democracy. Social movements could be the answer. Rest of World. https://restofworld.org/2021/social-media-india-democracy/.

Laclau, E. (2005). The future of radical democracy. in L. Tønder, & L. Thomassen, Radical Democracy: politics between abundance and lack, pp. 256-262. Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.

Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London & New York: Verso.

Law, A. (2022). Democracy: Definition, characteristics, and types. ADCO Law. https://adcolaw.com/blog/democracy-definition-characteristics-and-types/.

Leppanen. J. (2016). A political theory of dissent: Dissent at the core of radical democracy. https://helda.helsinki.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/baddb406-3354-4841-84cd-abd35ae42b73/content.

Panwar, N. (2021). Stifling dissent: The regulation of internet in India. Catalyst - International Development News, Features, and Opinions. https://catalystmcgill.com/stifling-dissent-the-regulation-of-internet-in-india/.

Price, G. (2024). Democracy in India. Chatham House – International Affairs Think Tank. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2022/04/democracy-india.

Roy, S. (2023). Democracy, dissent, and dialogue in contemporary India. Journal of Dialogue Studies, 11, 257-271.

Salient features of the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2023. (2021). https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1947264.

Singh. A (2012). Criminalising dissent: Consequences of UAPA. Economic and Political weekly. https://www.epw.in/journal/2012/38/commentary/criminalising-dissent.html.

SOAS. (2024). Democracy and dissent in India. https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/event/democracy-and-dissent-india.

Srishti Jaswal. (2023). Monitoring the media: How India uses surveillance to suppress dissent. https://www.thenewsminute.com/news/monitoring-media-how-india-uses-surveillance-suppress-dissent-173037.

Srivastava K. V. (2016). Nehru’s views about democracy. Mainstream Weekly, 47. https://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article6814.html.

Tharoor, S. (2020). Modi man of destiny?’. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 15, 234–249.

The Economist. (2024). India tightens the screws on online dissent. https://www.economist.com/asia/2024/01/25/india-tightens-the-screws-on-online-dissent.

The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. (2021.). PRS legislative research. https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-information-technology-intermediary-guidelines-and-digital-media-ethics-code-rules-2021.

The light of the Constitution - Indian Liberals. (2022, November 16). Indian liberals. https://indianliberals.in/content/the-light-of-the-indian-constitution/.

The Print. (2020). Suppression of dissent has a chilling effect on democracy: Justice Deepak Gupta. https://theprint.in/judiciary/suppression-of-dissent-has-a-chilling-effect-on-democracy-justice-deepak-gupta/370449/.

United Nations. (n.d.). Democracy. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/democracy.

Williams S.N. (2024). India is doing its best to control online speech. Here’s why you should be worried. https://www.newslaundry.com/2024/10/21/india-is-doing-its-best-to-control-online-speech-heres-why-you-should-be-worried.

Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Published

28-07-2025

How to Cite

Bhagyasree, M. C. (2025). Emerging Dynamics of Dissent in Indian Democracy: A Critical Perspective. Social Science Journal for Advanced Research, 5(4), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16777613

Issue

Section

Articles

ARK