The political processes that result from the developmental articulations across the spaces are frequently diverse. Although this takes place at the level of socioeconomic strata, or the spatial aggregate, the political process changes very quickly. Socioeconomic disparities between groups may lead to conflicts in the public sphere. The ability to acquire resources, the economic standing of the populace, and cultural modernisation all play a significant role in the differentiation of social groups. It is a fact that distinct levels of awareness have arisen as a result of progressive articulation across social groups. We frequently find research on age groups, occupational mobility, gender, religion, ethnicity, caste, etc. in the geographical literature. All of these categories are combined into hegemonic and subaltern groupings. Such articulations are really about having access to resources like land, water, forests, institutions, and public spaces. The electoral process will advance democracy, which will make it easier for marginalised people to access the public sphere. However, in the name of party structures and governmental efficiency, electoral practises oppose the radical social transformation. In fact, the election process provides scope for a range of issues that the general public faces. As a result, it often gives rise to various ideologies, with geographic space assuming a major role.